|
|
 Rank: Thing Fling
Joined: 10/23/2006 Posts: 3,025
|
Certified Refurbished Product Thing Fling brings you another powerful little gadget: The WVC54GC-RM Compact Wireless-G Internet Video Camera For starters, it supports up to four simultaneous remote users. With its built-in stand-alone web server, no PC is necessary, so this is no run-of-the-mill webcam. Or you can just slip it into its included stand for desktop use. Whatever works best for you, the WVC54GC is there for you. High-quality video stream comes standard. So does piece of mind. Now it`s easier than ever to keep track of your home, your kids, your workplace… all the things that really matter to you. Please note that this is a Linksys Certified Refurbished Product. That means it was refurbished under Linksys quality control, and Thing Fling will ship you this item without having opened the package or inspected it (like everything we fling you). It comes with a limited 90 day manufacturer warranty. Let the Linksys Compact Wireless-G Internet Video Camera help you keep tabs on your world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Rank: Serious Thing Flinger

Joined: 11/12/2007 Posts: 35
|
Froogledand Amazon customer reviews. Enjoy! Think I'll be passing this on this one. Even though its a nice deal, sounds like I still better off with my logitech and 3rd party monitoring software.
|
|
|
 Rank: Serious Thing Flinger
Joined: 2/14/2008 Posts: 2
|
Yo -- better check the Amazon reviews, as was stated -- you might not be getting what you think! http://www.amazon.com/Li...d=1203974037&sr=8-1
|
|
|
 Rank: Casual Flinger
Joined: 1/17/2007 Posts: 2
|
This is cheaper at buy.com with 1st time Google checkout.
Here is the full writeup:
Manufacturer: LINKSYS - IMO EOL Mfg Part#: WVC54GC-RM Buy.com Sales Rank: 370 The Linksys Compact Wireless-G Internet Video Camera sends live video through the Internet to a web browser anywhere in the world! This compact, self-contained unit lets you keep track of your home, your kids, your workplace -- whatever's important to you.
Unlike standard "web cams" that require an attached PC, the Internet Video Camera contains its own web server, so it can connect directly to a network, either over Wireless-G (802.11g) networking, or over 10/100 Ethernet cable. The advanced MPEG-4 video compression produces a high-quality, high-framerate, up to 320x240 video stream.
The Compact Internet Video Camera's unique form-factor and wireless connectivity allows you to mount it on a wall nearly anywhere, or slip it into its included stand for desktop use. Once it's connected to your home network, you can "see what it sees" from any Windows-based PC in the house, while the video stream is secured from the outside world, hidden behind your Router. If you want the video to be visible from outside your home network, you can open an appropriate port on the Router, and then create password protected accounts to manage access to the camera, or leave it wide open for the world to see. The SoloLink domain service (trial sign-up included) lets you access your camera using an easy-to-remember "name", even if your home Internet connection uses a dynamic IP address.
You can also turn on Security Mode, which tells the camera to send a message with a short video attached to up to three email addresses whenever it detects motion in its field of view. You can then log onto the live video stream if the situation warrants. The included Viewer & Recorder utility lets you record the audio/video stream to your local hard drive, "live" or on a predetermined schedule.
Let the Linksys Compact Wireless-G Internet Video Camera help you keep tabs on your world.
|
|
|
 Rank: Serious Thing Flinger
Joined: 10/31/2007 Posts: 48
|
Seriously... "high-quality video"... it is a compressed 320x240 video stream ! It is medium quality, if not low quality by today's standards !
I feel like reading a worthless product description on eBay from some seller in Asia who do not know anything about what the item is and/or can do.
ThingFling, please do not fall into that trap. You may feel like you're attracting customers, but once they will see how crappy the product is compared to what they expected by reading your description, you can bet they won't trust you any longer.
|
|
|
 Rank: Royal Flinger
Joined: 4/16/2007 Posts: 55 Location: SE Ohio
|
I've read terrible reviews of this camera. Being wireless is nice, but extremely poor low light performance makes this a bad deal. Not to mention it's very low resolution. Most cheap cams (wired) do 640x480.
|
|
|
 Rank: Crazy Flinger
Joined: 12/20/2006 Posts: 92 Location: St. Louis, MO - The Gateway to the west
|
Might be an OK deal, but 50 clams is too much for me. I'll just use my $20 webcam with a wire. 35 flings and still going strong!
|
|
|
 Rank: Crazy Flinger

Joined: 12/15/2007 Posts: 107 Location: Baltimore
|
I'm still very happy w/ my Apple iSight.
|
|
|
 Rank: Royal Flinger
Joined: 1/25/2007 Posts: 174
|
Jeffro_Home wrote:I've read terrible reviews of this camera. Being wireless is nice, but extremely poor low light performance makes this a bad deal. Not to mention it's very low resolution. Most cheap cams (wired) do 640x480.  Not to mention, a certain site rhyming with fling thing sent me a wired Philips one in an amb a while back that works nicely, though the res is not great.
|
|
|
 Rank: Uber Flinger

Joined: 5/2/2007 Posts: 975 Location: Northern VA
|
Nice product if you need it. You all should stop comparing it to a standard web cam, they fit different purposes. Webcam is attached to a PC and thus most aptly suited being used for video chat type purposes. This is wifi, thus wireless and has probably decent range. First thing that sprung to mind for me was finally making that front door video monitoring system I always wanted..... A good baby monitor, or nanny cam I am sure too. Well not for me, this time, but a nice product if you need it, I think. True the res is on the light side, but it is also true that 640x480 is not as over abundantly common in normal webcams like someone else suggested either. As for low light, well they usually don't handle low light well across the board...
|
|
|
 Rank: Power Flinger
Joined: 1/9/2008 Posts: 17
|
|
|
|
 Rank: Casual Flinger
Joined: 4/26/2007 Posts: 25
|
Thing Fling wrote:High-quality video stream comes standard. So does piece of mind. I totally didn't get what Thing Fling is trying to say here.
|
|
|
 Rank: Casual Flinger
Joined: 4/26/2007 Posts: 25
|
scaredwitless wrote:Nice product if you need it.
You all should stop comparing it to a standard web cam, they fit different purposes. Webcam is attached to a PC and thus most aptly suited being used for video chat type purposes.
This is wifi, thus wireless and has probably decent range. First thing that sprung to mind for me was finally making that front door video monitoring system I always wanted..... A good baby monitor, or nanny cam I am sure too.
Well not for me, this time, but a nice product if you need it, I think. True the res is on the light side, but it is also true that 640x480 is not as over abundantly common in normal webcams like someone else suggested either. As for low light, well they usually don't handle low light well across the board... I laughed when I saw your post. First, even in TF's description they told us it be can used as a standard web cam, why should we not compare these two kinds? And monitoring front door/kids with this web cam? With resolution this low and no IR built-in, you probably won't even see what kind of toy your kids are playing or who exactly is knocking your front door(let alone you can see there a person knocking on your door with a low/no light at night). And the resolution comment, do a quick search on froogle/pricegrabber on webcam under 40 dollars. I doubt you can find many that is not 640x480. And the low light, i tweaked my 20 dollar web cam into an IR web cam, works great when I chat with online with my room's lights off. Plus one huge minus is the activex(IE only) control of this web cam, this throws a lot of people off. In conclusion, I hope people actually read the comments here before purchasing the this particular "high-quality" wireless web cam. Because you might end up getting something that disappoint you big time.
|
|
|
 Rank: Serious Thing Flinger
Joined: 2/26/2007 Posts: 2
|
Pilotguy...
Do you actually pay for this through the Linksys service as mentioned by a previous post? If not how did you set it up?
Thank you
|
|
|
 Rank: Power Flinger
Joined: 1/9/2008 Posts: 17
|
arb7445 wrote:Pilotguy...
Do you actually pay for this through the Linksys service as mentioned by a previous post? If not how did you set it up?
Thank you You can use a free servie available at www.dyndns.com. Works the same way but they do it for free.
|
|
|
 Rank: Uber Flinger

Joined: 5/2/2007 Posts: 975 Location: Northern VA
|
freude wrote: I laughed when I saw your post. First, even in TF's description they told us it be can used as a standard web cam, why should we not compare these two kinds? And monitoring front door/kids with this web cam? With resolution this low and no IR built-in, you probably won't even see what kind of toy your kids are playing or who exactly is knocking your front door(let alone you can see there a person knocking on your door with a low/no light at night). And the resolution comment, do a quick search on froogle/pricegrabber on webcam under 40 dollars. I doubt you can find many that is not 640x480. And the low light, i tweaked my 20 dollar web cam into an IR web cam, works great when I chat with online with my room's lights off. Plus one huge minus is the activex(IE only) control of this web cam, this throws a lot of people off. In conclusion, I hope people actually read the comments here before purchasing the this particular "high-quality" wireless web cam. Because you might end up getting something that disappoint you big time. Dear Freude, So glad I amuse you. I hate to inform you however, you missed my point entirely. The reason why you should not compare it to a regular web cam, was my point. If you just need a regular webcam, you definitely should skip this cam and looki for something cheaper or with bonus features like IR, microphone, tracking, etc. IF you need a wifi enabled camera, this will work. If you need something that can readily and easily be made internet accessible, this will work too, figure out what port(s) you need to forward on your home router and then configure a service like dyndns.org as pilotguy uses to give your home IP a human readable IP and you ought to be set. As for your resolution comments, this resolution isn't going to pick off any fleas even two inches away, but it will suffice for most purposes, believe it or not, this is a resolution we all used for many years. etc etc, I don't even need to bother responding to your comment on low light and converting your webcam into an infa-red cam. My assertion I that most unmodified and basic webcams(without IR capability,or without built in spotlights) don't handle low light well is still true. I know one thing for sure, this cam isn't for you, but for those who need its capabilities, it is a decent choice at this price.
|
|
|
 Rank: Uber Flinger

Joined: 5/2/2007 Posts: 975 Location: Northern VA
|
Thanks for sharing! Really neat to see the cam in action. (BTW anyone who can't view the video.. It is IE only) So is that the view outside your house then? Is it through a window or do you have the camera outside? And if outside how does it hold up to the elements?
|
|
|
 Rank: Power Flinger
Joined: 1/9/2008 Posts: 17
|
scaredwitless wrote:Thanks for sharing! Really neat to see the cam in action. (BTW anyone who can't view the video.. It is IE only) So is that the view outside your house then? Is it through a window or do you have the camera outside? And if outside how does it hold up to the elements? The camera is in the garage looking out the window looking down the street in Toledo OH. This camera is a bit difficult to set up what with port forwarding, firewalls, voip issues and the like, but I have managed to do so in spite of all these problems it can be done. At the very least you will learn about port forwarding and DNS issues. As I said in another post, there is no need to use Linksys' DNS service, instead use www.dyndns.com which will track any ip address changes your ISP makes. They will assign a subdomain to you, and the address to use will look like this: http://fred.dyndns.co m:[port number]. the actual address for mine is http://pilotguy.gotdns.com:6553 .
|
|
|
 Rank: Casual Flinger
Joined: 3/18/2007 Posts: 3
|
Linksys Quality?
That's not an endorsement, it means it's slightly better than no-name junk.
|
|
|
 Rank: Power Flinger
Joined: 3/25/2007 Posts: 2
|
"You can use a free servie available at www.dyndns.com." dyndns does not work for me. I have this camera, I am a geek, so I should have made it work. I use it on the front of the house, it works, has to be reset if it gets hot, about once per month. Also it has some minor software glitches, in the record mode, you can't go out to a USB HD, so you are stuck with recording to internal drives. For $49 its a good deal. BTW my Linksys Camera is better, but cost is higher. Has smaller, easy to avoid, software glitches. I saw reviews that Panasonic was the best.
|
|
|
| Users browsing this topic (does not include guests) |
|
Guest (Hidden)
|